Graham Hancock Documentary Netflix 2022: Objective Reviews
Searching for an objective review of the Graham Hancock Documentary Netflix 2022? Here we go! Graham Hancock, a journalist, compiles the results of three decades of investigation on possible human civilizations that predated the era studied by historians and archaeologists in the Ancient Apocalypse.
He argues that these artifacts demonstrate the existence of human civilizations dating back to the Ice Age when people were thought to be primitive hunters and gatherers incapable of complex technologies like construction and farming. This occurred thousands of years before the dawn of the earliest known human societies.
Shot one: producer asking journalist Graham Hancock to define himself during an interview. Jump to a slew of footage from interviews and news reports in which he gets grilled on his potentially groundbreaking theory regarding the development of human society.
For the premiere, he travels to Java, Indonesia, to visit Gunung Padang. Evidence suggests that humans transported thousands of rock slabs of volcanic basalt to the site about 9,000 years ago to construct a temple. According to interviews with local historians and archaeologists conducted by Hancock, it is clear that people hewed the slabs and that some of them were mortared together.
Using ground-penetrating radar and other cutting-edge equipment, we show Hancock that there is evidence of a three-level underground chamber beginning at a depth of 10 meters below the surface. Evidence suggests that our earliest organized civilizations stood upon the foundations of this very temple.
He suggests that a rapid rise in sea levels during the Ice Age, when Java was a part of a subcontinent called Sunderland, resulted in a massive flood that wiped out that civilization. All cultures, including the Biblical account of Noah, tell of the same catastrophic flood.
Source: Netflix
Our View: If you approach Graham Hancock's explanations in Ancient Apocalypse with an open mind, you should find the show both fascinating and enjoyable. The dramatic score, amazing cinematography, and eye-popping graphics make Graham's claims sound less like conjecture and more like facts. But if you listen more closely, you'll notice that Hancock is still making assumptions that can't be easily proven or disproven, even after all this time and investigation.
As an illustration, he claims that the columnar basalt fragments found at the Gunung Padang site were "obviously" carved by people. However, how is it so obvious? Do we only care about straight lines? Something with a regular shape or pattern? He doesn't elaborate. On the contrary, he makes no assumptions about the ancient civilization's technology that constructed or transported the columns to the site.
All those years of study have given Graham an aura of authority that makes his speculation sound more credible than it is. But when it comes to the assumption that the same great flood wiped out this civilization that other cultures and religions have depicted over the centuries, he digs more into conjecture than hard proof. Then, he says, "the way archaeology works is that there will continue to be resistance to new evidence," which, along with his other similarly wistful statements, makes one wonder whether the resistance is a result of an institutional weakness within the archaeological community or whether there is something specifically about Graham's work that is being resisted.
If you found this article interesting, don't hesitate to visit our website AUBTU.BIZ to get access to a wide range of news about your favorite movies.
He argues that these artifacts demonstrate the existence of human civilizations dating back to the Ice Age when people were thought to be primitive hunters and gatherers incapable of complex technologies like construction and farming. This occurred thousands of years before the dawn of the earliest known human societies.
#1. Graham Hancock Documentary Netflix 2022: Objective Reviews
Shot one: producer asking journalist Graham Hancock to define himself during an interview. Jump to a slew of footage from interviews and news reports in which he gets grilled on his potentially groundbreaking theory regarding the development of human society.
For the premiere, he travels to Java, Indonesia, to visit Gunung Padang. Evidence suggests that humans transported thousands of rock slabs of volcanic basalt to the site about 9,000 years ago to construct a temple. According to interviews with local historians and archaeologists conducted by Hancock, it is clear that people hewed the slabs and that some of them were mortared together.
Using ground-penetrating radar and other cutting-edge equipment, we show Hancock that there is evidence of a three-level underground chamber beginning at a depth of 10 meters below the surface. Evidence suggests that our earliest organized civilizations stood upon the foundations of this very temple.
He suggests that a rapid rise in sea levels during the Ice Age, when Java was a part of a subcontinent called Sunderland, resulted in a massive flood that wiped out that civilization. All cultures, including the Biblical account of Noah, tell of the same catastrophic flood.
Source: NetflixOur View: If you approach Graham Hancock's explanations in Ancient Apocalypse with an open mind, you should find the show both fascinating and enjoyable. The dramatic score, amazing cinematography, and eye-popping graphics make Graham's claims sound less like conjecture and more like facts. But if you listen more closely, you'll notice that Hancock is still making assumptions that can't be easily proven or disproven, even after all this time and investigation.
As an illustration, he claims that the columnar basalt fragments found at the Gunung Padang site were "obviously" carved by people. However, how is it so obvious? Do we only care about straight lines? Something with a regular shape or pattern? He doesn't elaborate. On the contrary, he makes no assumptions about the ancient civilization's technology that constructed or transported the columns to the site.
All those years of study have given Graham an aura of authority that makes his speculation sound more credible than it is. But when it comes to the assumption that the same great flood wiped out this civilization that other cultures and religions have depicted over the centuries, he digs more into conjecture than hard proof. Then, he says, "the way archaeology works is that there will continue to be resistance to new evidence," which, along with his other similarly wistful statements, makes one wonder whether the resistance is a result of an institutional weakness within the archaeological community or whether there is something specifically about Graham's work that is being resisted.
If you found this article interesting, don't hesitate to visit our website AUBTU.BIZ to get access to a wide range of news about your favorite movies.
Share this article
Advertisement