Before adopting animals, pet owners always have to consider their financial and conditional abilities because these paw-pals will cost some expenses for their fundamental requirements. But what would happen if these adorable creatures appeared to have bad health conditions and demanded bigger budgets? That is a migraine-causing question we believe many animal lovers have had to face, including the main characters in the story we're about to share today. The case was pinned on the popular subreddit
r/relationships by the original poster with her account name
u/dogthrow_away. Here is the whole context:
Source: ABC (photo used for illustration)
The OP and her man had a pet dog named Fido, who suffered from terrible allergic outbreaks and required immunotherapy. The pup's treatments were quite expensive, so the husband suggested having him put down after a short period complaining about the canine's disbursement, which enraged the OP. She thought he was crucial to the pet and inconsiderate toward her.
Source: u/dogthrow_away
According to the OP, they are completely able to deal with the vet bills without going bankrupt. Plus, he witnessed every day how important Fido was to her and how hard she had been trying to fight for his life. Therefore, the idea of getting rid of the dog was unacceptable.
Source: u/dogthrow_away
In the comment zone below the post, Redditors had many different thoughts. The absolute pets-equal-family people desired to form a frontline to battle against any concept of abandoning the
animals when they still had hopes. They announced they would rather be alone than with partners who didn't see eye to eye with them on this aspect. Being kind to pets was one of the determinative factors for their relationship.
Source: jlynnbizatch
Source: stampadhesive
Source: growflet
Another group pointed out that the wife and husband had reasons to serve themselves right. Every couple had differences in viewpoint and conception of value. It was too early and blurry to affirm that he was a cold-hearted money lover. They advised the OP to sit down and have a comprehensive conversation that both could softly and politely confess what they needed to say.
Source: buckeyegal923
Source: myarr
Source: monkwren
On the other side, some people reckoned the husband was reasonable when he didn't love the dog too much to carry his burden. The couple should have clarified their monetary share of their pet. Whether they quarreled about money or the dog's life, being fair and honest would solve the problem clearly.
Source: fluffybunnybutts
Source: Lozzif
Source: littlewoolie
The OP updated her situation: she had discussed the money share with her spouse. He admitted he had some financial troubles and agreed with her offer to pay Fido's bonus treatment. Finally, they accord to keep the dog.We're glad to see the story end happily. Don't let us wait for your responses for too long! Please leave comments in the section below after clicking the like-share button!